How did
federal bureaucracies come to play crucial roles in political life?
What are
the proper scope and limits of bureaucratic activity?
Under what
circumstances is bureaucratic regulation consistent with American political
culture (i.e., America’s fundamental "world view" (paradigm) and fundamental
American attitudes, values and beliefs)?
Under what
circumstances do bureaucracies serve legitimate governmental functions
accurately (responsively), efficiently and fairly?
What are
the social, cultural and psychological impacts of bureaucracies?
The Dilemmas
of Bureaucracy
American
public is of two minds
Scorn bureaucrats
Over zealous
guardians of status quo.
Lazy/unimaginative
Too liberal,
large, powerful, unaccountable, intrusive.
Lots of
waste and fat in govt.
Likes public
services
Social security
Environmental
regulation
Food and
drug testing
Interstate
highways
Federal
crime and anti-narcotic efforts
National
defense
When asked,
few members of the public are dissatisfied with their personal contacts
with civil servants
A ubiquitous
feature of modern bureaucracy is delegation.
Legislation
typically delegates policy implementation to a bureaucracy.
The specialized
knowledge of an expert agency may be necessary to unravel the technical
uncertainties surrounding the impact of alternative policy actions;
However,
the policy preferences of bureaucrats are often different from those of
political leaders, and, if they have unique expertise, the former may use
their superior knowledge to advantage themselves rather than to carry out
the latter’s policy wishes.
Definition:
The Ideal
Type
An analytical
construct that serving as a measuring rod to determine the extent to which
concrete institutions are similar and how they differ from some defined
measure
Not meant
to refer to the "best" or to some moral ideal.
The ideal
type involves determining the "logically consistent" features of a social
institution.
The ideal
type never corresponds to concrete reality but is a description to which
we can compare reality.
"Ideal Capitalism,"
for example, is used extensively in social science literature. According
to the ideal type, capitalism consists of four basic features:
Private
Ownership
Pursuit
of Profit
Competition
Laissez
Faire
In reality,
all capitalist systems deviate from the theoretical construct we call "ideal
capitalism." But the construct allows us to compare and contrast economic
systems of various societies to this definition.
Bureaucracy
(Weber's ideal-type):
Goal-oriented
organizations designed according to rational principles in order to efficiently
attain their goals.
What is
the bureaucracy supposed to do in a Democratic Political System?
Immediate
goals:
Implement
policy (Congress is very VAGUE!)
Provide
services to people (Street level bureaucracy)
Fundamental
purposes:
Provide
order to facilitate life, liberty, property ownership and use and the pursuit
of happiness
Offices
are ranked in a hierarchical order, with information flowing up
the chain of command, directives flowing down.
Operations
of the organizations are characterized by
impersonal rules explicitly
stating duties, responsibilities,
standardized procedures and conduct
of office holders.
Offices
are highly specialized
Appointments
to these offices are made according to
specialized qualifications
rather than ascribed criteria.
All of these
ideal characteristics have one goal, to promote the efficient attainment
of the organization's goals.
The Reality
of Bureaucracy
The Federal
Bureaucracy
Career government
employees work in
14 cabinet
departments
Over 50
independent agencies
The armed
forces
The Postal
Service
The extensive
Veterans' Administration health system.
Federal
Employees: About 3 million civilians (2 million more in the military)
State and
Local bureaucrats--about 13 million
The role
of the government in a free market
Establishes
the rules/acts as umpire
Respond
to economic cycles
Market failure
Public goods
and Public Services
Monopolies
Negative
externalities
Example:
The EPA
Response
to market failure to control pollution
Decisions
that had to be made (applicable to all govt. intervention)
Should the
government intervene?
At what
level should the intervention take place?
How much
intervention should there be?
"Zero-Risk"
"Safe-Levels"
Balancing
The Bureaucracy
in Action
Agencies
become governmental interest groups on their own behalf, working with lobbyists,
Congressional staff, and pressure groups (Iron Triangles)
Building
alliances is part of the job of agency heads, who may choose to expend
agency resources disproportionately on high-visibility services which create
a favorable public image
Agencies
tend to resist outside change and are predisposed toward proposals which
will increase agency size and scope.
Bureaucratic
Accuracy (Responsiveness), Accountability, and Reform
Congress
can compel agencies to interpret/apply law to its wishes
Congress
also enjoys the benefit of bureaucracy, which can be used to direct services
and jobs to their constituents
Moreover,
Congress is often inclined to pass the buck of responsibility to agencies,
giving them broad discretion for implementation, thereby freeing Congress
to be able to criticize what they want later on
Even "red
tape" can help members of Congress since it channels constituents to seek
help from and depend upon the help of Congressional offices
Many of
the 20,000 Congressional staffers play just this constituent service role
Administrative
Procedure Act of 1946
Agencies
publicize machinery/organization
Allow hearings
and witnesses on rule changes and adjudication.
Courts may
hear appeals on agency actions.
GAO audits
spending
Informal
checks on agencies
Ethics
Experts
Attitudes
of branches, parties, individuals.
Political
checks on bureaucracies.
Presidents
who hope to control the bureaucracy must make full use of their powers:
appointment, reorganization, budgeting, and reassignment (made more possible
by Carter's 1978 Senior Executive Service reform),
Federal
agency and bureau chiefs are responsible in principle to the president,
but in reality the career bureaucracy can have a great inertia.
The Office
of Management (OMB), an executive branch agency, plays a key role, receiving
agency budget requests and forming the annual budget of the president,
usually the basis for Congressional action.
In this
way, the OMB can serve as a vehicle for forcing agencies to tow the presidential
line if they want to get their budgets through the OMB
Only rarely
can an agency go over the head of the OMB to appeal directly to Congress
for money.
Overall,
there is a consensus that all national bureaucracies have become more responsive
to Congress and the public in recent decades and there is not much momentum
behind reform ideas like term limits for bureaucrats or job rotation of
career civil servants.
Texas Bureaucracies
Two basic
reasons for the expanded scope of governments in the United States since
World War II.
It is only
through the bureaucratic coordination of the action of large numbers of
people that large-scale planning and coordination, both for the modern
state and economy, become possible
Developing
complexity and sophistication of issues that must be addressed in providing
legitimate governmental functions requires specialization and constant
attention
Additional
reasons for the expanded scope of governments in Texas
Governor
has no formal Cabinet
"Plural
Executive" (Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Comptroller, Land Commissioner,
Agriculture Commissioner, Railroad Commission, State Board of Education)
disperses power
Four measures
Texas has taken to make its state bureaucracies accountable to the public.
Do each of these measures make our bureaucracies more or less accurate,
efficient and fair?
State
Ombudsman, an investigator handling citizens complaints against state
agencies (1-800-252-9600)
Sunset
laws: State agencies must be reviewed every 12 years and recreated
by the legislature or go out of business
Performance
reviews: Comptroller conducts reviews of state programs
Revolving
door restrictions: prohibit former board members and key employees
of regulatory agencies from going to work for rregulated companies within
a certain period after leaving state posts
Three ways
a state agency can increase its bureaucratic power in Texas.
Preliminaries
Legislature
meets only 5 month every year, so decreased legislative oversight
Governor
has limited powers over executive branch
Appointment
(confirmed by Senate) and removal of members of 200 boards and commissions
Cannot remove
predecessor's appointees
Most positions
on boards and commissions are part-time and unpaid, rendering occupants
dependent upon constituencies they are serving or regulating, veteran administrators,
and career bureaucrats
Budget authority
Line Item
Veto may be effective sometimes
Interpret
vague laws, often changing its purpose and expanding their power (subject
of course to court interpretations and administrative rules)
Constituencies
may lobby to have new responsibilities assigned
May bid
on services performed by other agencies if they think they can do the work
more efficiently
Query: Do
these methods make the agency more or less responsive to the needs of the
state? Why?
Bureaucracies
and the Self
Two aspects
of self:
The I as
the active knower, the subject
The Me,
the passive contents, the object
Three components
of self:
The physical
self,
The mental
self,
The spiritual
self
Self-esteem
is a very useful variable in helping us to understand individual social
behavior.
Our self-esteem
defines how we judge other people, how we communicate with them, whether
we choose to lead or follow others, when we will help others, when we aggress
against others, when we love others.
Negative
self-esteem creates a constellation of behaviors producing self-fulfilling
prophecies
Our conceptions
of self are influenced by history and cultural context.
We tend
to evaluate ourselves in terms of the ideal self, the ought self, and the
actual self as strongly influenced by our regional culture
Individualistic
cultures, describe themselves primarily in attributive terms.
Traditional
cultures describes themselves in status terms
Context
sometimes motivates us to get an accurate picture of the self (self-verification)
and it sometimes motivates to get a positive picture of the self (self-enhancement).
Self-schemas
are "cognitive generalizations about the self, derived from past experience,
that organize and guide the information processing of self related information
contained in the individual's social experiences.
Self-awareness
is the process whereby we direct attention to the self as an object
Self-consciousness
is an individual difference variable which gauges our ability to become
self-aware.