Stephen F. Austin State University

Academic/Non-Academic Administrative Support Unit

Assessment Plan/Report

Spring 2009

 

Chemistry Unit Mission:

 

The mission of the Chemistry Department is to provide a dynamic, learning –centered education that is dedicated to enhancing student success.  This focus on excellence in chemical education:  prepares students for graduate and/or professional schools (i.e. medical); prepares students for positions in industry, government service and teaching; allows science students with non-chemistry majors to relate chemistry to their major science; and acquaints non-science students with the methods, concepts, and achievements of the science of chemistry.

 

 

Unit Outcomes/Objectives

 

The objectives of an administrative unit usually focus more on process and student development than learning.  The objectives will primarily describe what the department is going to do and what its impact will be on students and other key stakeholders.  Identify five to eight outcomes/objectives.  Make sure these outcomes/objectives tie to the college/division and university mission statement and strategic plan.  Outcomes/objectives should be for the entire unit and not individual or specific unit tasks.

 

1.  The chemistry department will strive to maintain a quality program for biochemistry and chemistry majors.

2.  The chemistry department will graduate students with who are prepared for entry into professional schools, graduate programs, or the job market. 

3.  The chemistry department will strive to promote research opportunities for both undergraduate and graduate students exposing students to an essential part of their chemistry education. 

4.  The chemistry department will promote professional growth by encouraging faculty and students to present research at professional conferences, submit grants, and publish scholarly activities.

5.  The chemistry department will provide modern technology that will enhance the chemistry program by providing students engagement opportunities with instrumentation.

6.  The chemistry department will make an effort to recruit/retain majors. 

7.  The chemistry department will successfully campaign for a new modern chemistry building. 

 

 

 

Continue until all outcomes/objectives for your unit are listed.  Then complete the following for each outcome/objective.

 


Unit Outcome/Objective #1

 

What will your unit accomplish?  Be specific.

 

The chemistry department will strive to maintain a quality program for biochemistry and chemistry majors.

 

ASSESSMENT PLAN –

 

It is recommended that a minimum of two methods of assessment be prepared for each unit outcome/objective.

 

Method of Assessment #1:

 

A.     To maintain a quality program, the faculty will need to review and revise the curriculum to ensure that it is rigorous, logically sequenced, and reflective of the current state of the field.  Chemistry is required to maintain this quality standard by the American Chemical Society Committee on Professional Training (ACS-CPT).  The chemistry program is regularly evaluated relative to certification guidelines established by ACS-CPT.  CPT reviews our program every five years to continue certification which indicates a quality chemistry program.  

 

B.     Success will be indicated by continued accreditation from the American Chemical Society Committee on Professional Training.

 

Method of Assessment # 2

 

A.     To be a quality program, the program should maintain competent faculty who are enthusiastic about teaching.   Assessment of our faculty comes from data collected from each course through student evaluations and classroom visits by other faculty.

 

B.     100% of the faculty will maintain student evaluations that have a weighted average score of 3.75 or higher (5.0 scale) on departmental questions.  All faculty classroom evaluations by their peers are expected to obtain a rating of satisfactory or above. 

 

ASSESSMENT COLLECTION – Data will be collected each term.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________

 

ASSESSMENT REPORT - These items are completed after assessment activities, at the end of the assessment period.

 

            Findings: What findings resulted from assessment activities for this outcome/objective?

 

Chemistry curriculum continues to obtain the approval of the American Chemical Society (ACS).  ACS reviews our course offerings, laboratory facilities, instrumentation, examinations, student undergraduate research reports, etc. every five years.  Students who successfully complete all of the required courses and approved electives in the program obtain an ACS certified degree.  Our program continues to pass this extensive external review and evaluation.  The success of this external review demonstrates the validity of the assessment measure for this outcome.

 

100% of the faculty obtained student evaluations that had a weighted average score of 3.75 or higher (5.0 scale) on departmental questions.  The average of the department was 4.42 which is extremely high for a science based course.  All non-tenure faculty had their classroom teaching evaluated by their peers, and 100% obtained a rating of satisfactory or above. 

 

 

 

Use of Results:       What changes, were made in response to the findings?  This section should indicate that relevant unit staff reviewed the assessment findings and implemented appropriate change in response to the findings.

Remember to complete the above information for each outcome/objective.


Unit Outcome/Objective #2

 

What will your unit accomplish?  Be specific.

 

The chemistry department will graduate students who are prepared for entry into professional schools, graduate programs, or the job market.

 

ASSESSMENT PLAN –

 

It is recommended that a minimum of two methods of assessment be prepared for each unit outcome/objective.

 

Method of Assessment #1:

 

A.     The department believes the success of the chemistry program is ultimately measured by the success of our graduates to obtain entry into professional schools and graduate programs. 

 

B.     100% of our graduates who select to apply to graduate or professional programs are accepted.

 

 

Method of Assessment # 2

 

A.     The department believes the success of the chemistry program is ultimately measured by the success of our graduates to obtain entry into the job market. 

 

B.     100% of our graduates, who select to obtain employment immediately following graduation, find employment within 3 months of graduation. 

 

 

ASSESSMENT COLLECTION – Data will be collected each term.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________

 

ASSESSMENT REPORT - These items are completed after assessment activities, at the end of the assessment period.

 

            Findings: What findings resulted from assessment activities for this outcome/objective?

 

100% of our graduates that applied to graduate or professional programs were accepted.  Latisha West enrolled at UTHSC Tyler – MS Biotech and Kristen Baugh enrolled at Georgia Tech – PhD Chemistry.

                       

100% of our graduates, who select to obtain employment immediately following graduation, find employment within 3 months of graduation.  Crystal Cornelius is employed at UTSW as a research associate and Melody Adams accepted employment at a winery.

 

 

 

Use of Results:       What changes, were made in response to the findings?  This section should indicate that relevant unit staff reviewed the assessment findings and implemented appropriate change in response to the findings.

 

Remember to complete the above information for each outcome/objective.


Unit Outcome/Objective #3

 

What will your unit accomplish?  Be specific.

The chemistry department will strive to promote research opportunities for both undergraduate and graduate students exposing students to an essential part of their chemistry education.

 

ASSESSMENT PLAN –

 

It is recommended that a minimum of two methods of assessment be prepared for each unit outcome/objective.

 

Method of Assessment #1:

 

A.     To complete the chemistry education of our majors, it is essential that students be exposed to research which teaches students how to participate in their chosen profession.

 

B.     60% of our graduates will participate in at least one semester of research with a faculty mentor during their academic career.

 

 

Method of Assessment # 2

 

A.     To complete the chemistry education of our majors, it is essential that students be exposed to research which allows faculty to contribute to their profession.

 

B.     60% of our faculty will participate in research involving one or more students each year.

 

 

ASSESSMENT COLLECTION – Data will be collected each semester.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________

 

ASSESSMENT REPORT - These items are completed after assessment activities, at the end of the assessment period.

 

            Findings: What findings resulted from assessment activities for this outcome/objective?

Assessment #1

100% (4/4) of students graduating participated in a research project before graduating.  Research activities exceeded satisfactory performance levels and no major changes are needed at this time. There were 26 undergraduate and  6 graduate students who participated in research last year: Undergraduate - Rachel Siegele, Sean Garcia, Brittany Cooper, Jacklyn Knight, Ashley Graves, Holly Hartt, Mary Cheever, Priscilla DeGeorge, Annie Lofton, Amanda Wiltsey, Natalie Broussard, Jaqueline Greer, Eileen Rigsby, Aquila Dunn, Jonathan Martinez, Roberto Molina, Racheal Persaud, Amanda Coussens, Ivette Chicas, Amanda Nolan, Matthew Parks, Kristen Baugh, Joshua Perry, Natalie Gonsior, Melody Adams (338 project), Kristina Betzer (338 project); Graduate - Latisha West, Jason Perrin, Amy Rich, Nancy Waits, Kristen Baugh, Jennifer Perry.

 

80% (8/10) of our faculty participated in research involving one or more students during the previous year.  There were 8 professors who participated in undergraduate/graduate research last year: Boring, Franks, Frantzen, Harris, Janusa, Langley, Moore, Onchoke. There were only two professors that did not participate in research with students, but these professors were recently hired.  It is typical for new professors to take several semesters before they pursue research efforts.

 

 

 

 

Use of Results:       What changes, were made in response to the findings?  This section should indicate that relevant unit staff reviewed the assessment findings and implemented appropriate change in response to the findings.

 

Remember to complete the above information for each outcome/objective.


Unit Outcome/Objective #4

 

What will your unit accomplish?  Be specific.

 

The chemistry department will promote professional growth by encouraging faculty and students to present research at professional conferences, submit grants, and publish scholarly activities

 

ASSESSMENT PLAN –

 

It is recommended that a minimum of two methods of assessment be prepared for each unit outcome/objective.

 

Method of Assessment #1:

 

A.     Success in faculty conducting professional growth will be indicated through research/scholar activity in the areas of grants, reviews, and published works.

 

B.     70% of the faculty will be involved in one or more scholarly activity areas: writing grants, reviewing papers, presentations, and/or publishing articles/books.

 

 

Method of Assessment # 2

 

A.     Faculty/student involvement at professional conferences by attending and presenting research will measure the effectiveness of the department in this area. 

 

B.     Chemistry department will involved at least 2-5 students a year in presentations at conferences.

 

 

ASSESSMENT COLLECTION – Data will be collect annually.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________

 

ASSESSMENT REPORT - These items are completed after assessment activities, at the end of the assessment period.

 

            Findings: What findings resulted from assessment activities for this outcome/objective?

Assessment #1

100% of the faculty were involved in one or more scholarly activity areas: writing grants, reviewing papers, presentations, and/or publishing articles/books: 8 student posters (SFA, ACS, Clay Minerals Society), 3 faculty posters(SFA), 3 faculty papers (SFA, ACS, Clay Minerals Society) - Total: 14 presentations. 22 books/articles/chapters were reviewed by faculty. Dr. Kefa Onchoke published a paper entitled "Density Functional Theoretical Study of Mono-Nitrated Fluoranthnes" in Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds, 28, 193-212, 2008 and has another under review. Dr. John Moore and Dr. Rich Langley published a book "Biochemistry for Dummies" which has also been selected to be translated into German. Dr. John Moore contributed 2 chapters for a textbook. 9 grants submitted (6 outside: MRI - NMR, Merck, THECB; 4 SFA: 1 mini grants, 1 Faculty grant, 2 RDP): Dr. Alyx Frantzen - SFA Mini grant for $1000 - Geochemistry in the Southwest. Dr. Kefa Onchoke - SFA Faculty grant for $19k - Spectroscopic Signatures of Nitrated Cyclopenta-fused Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds. Conferences attended Welch, TAS, Regional ACS, National ACS, Clay Minerals. Editor of Chemistry for Kids in Journal of Chemical Education - Dr. John Moore. Board member of local chapter of American Chemical Society - Dr. Wayne Boring.

Assessment # 2

The Chemistry department involved 9 students in presentations at conferences (nationally or locally) over the last year:  (Undergraduates) Jacqueline Greer, Eileen Rigsby, Matthew Parks – 64th ACS Southwest Conference on Oct. 2-4, 2008 at Little Rock, AR;  Kristen Baugh – ACS/CMS National Meeting March 2008 at New Orleans, LA; Matthew Parks, Latisha West, Eileen Rigsby, Kristen Baugh, Crystal Cornelius, Aquila Dunn – Bright Ideas conference at SFASU; (Graduates) Latisha West  – 64th ACS Southwest Conference on Oct. 2-4, 2008 at Little Rock, AR; Jason Perrin – ACS/CMS National Meeting March 2008 at New Orleans, LA Jason Perrin – Bright Ideas conference at SFASU

 

 

 

Use of Results:       What changes, were made in response to the findings?  This section should indicate that relevant unit staff reviewed the assessment findings and implemented appropriate change in response to the findings.

 

Remember to complete the above information for each outcome/objective.


Unit Outcome/Objective #5

 

What will your unit accomplish?  Be specific.

 

The chemistry department will provide modern technology that will enhance the chemistry program by providing students engagement opportunities with instrumentation.

 

ASSESSMENT PLAN –

 

It is recommended that a minimum of two methods of assessment be prepared for each unit outcome/objective.

 

Method of Assessment #1:

 

A.     Assessment in this area will be linked to the purchase of modern instrumentation for research, upper level courses, equipment for freshman labs, etc. and utilizing this instrumentation in the classroom.

 

B.     Chemistry will purchase between $25-100k in instrumentation each year.

 

 

Method of Assessment # 2

 

A.     Chemistry instrumentation should be utilized in the classroom or research laboratory in conjunction with student learning. 

 

B.     90% of all instrumentation in the chemistry department will have a student purpose associated with it either in classroom instruction or research projects.

 

 

ASSESSMENT COLLECTION – Data will be collect annually.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________

 

ASSESSMENT REPORT - These items are completed after assessment activities, at the end of the assessment period.

 

            Findings: What findings resulted from assessment activities for this outcome/objective?

                                                                                                                   Assessment #1

Chemistry purchased $101,000 in equipment over the last year.  Chemistry purchased:  dielectric constant meter, fraction collector, hotplates, balances, Fluor spectrometer, pipettes, mel-temp apparatus, ELMO, lab benches, water purifying system, LabQuest meters

Assessment # 2

100% of all instrumentation in the chemistry department were for student purposes associated with classroom instruction or research projects.

 

 

Use of Results:       What changes, were made in response to the findings?  This section should indicate that relevant unit staff reviewed the assessment findings and implemented appropriate change in response to the findings.

 

Remember to complete the above information for each outcome/objective.


Unit Outcome/Objective #6

 

What will your unit accomplish?  Be specific.

 

The chemistry department will make an effort to recruit/retain majors. 

 

ASSESSMENT PLAN –

 

It is recommended that a minimum of two methods of assessment be prepared for each unit outcome/objective.

 

Method of Assessment #1:

 

A.     Success in recruiting majors will be determined by the number of students who declare biochemistry/chemistry as their undergraduate or graduate major.

 

B.     Increase in the number of undergraduate and graduate students declaring biochemistry or chemistry their major by 5% each year.

 

 

Method of Assessment # 2

 

A.     Success in retaining majors will be determined by the percentage of students who continue in biochemistry or chemistry as their major from year to year.

 

B.     40% of our majors will be retained from fall to fall.

 

 

ASSESSMENT COLLECTION – Data will be collected each fall.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________

 

ASSESSMENT REPORT - These items are completed after assessment activities, at the end of the assessment period.

 

            Findings: What findings resulted from assessment activities for this outcome/objective?

                                                                                                                   Assessment #1

Results exceeded satisfactory performance levels and no major changes are needed at this time.  Total number of undergraduate students declaring biochemistry or chemistry as their major increased from 75 to 83; this is a 10.7% increase.  The total number of graduate students declaring chemistry as their major increased from 3 to 8; this is a 167% increase.

Assessment # 2

45% of our majors were retained from fall 07 to fall 08 which exceeds the satisfactory performance level.   While this is above our goal, we would like to see a larger percentage of students retained.  The department will work on more personal contact with students through research, recruit teaching assistants from our majors, offer better awards for upper level majors, etc.  We will work on trying to get our majors to feel like their part of a family.

 

 

 

Use of Results:       What changes, were made in response to the findings?  This section should indicate that relevant unit staff reviewed the assessment findings and implemented appropriate change in response to the findings.

 

Remember to complete the above information for each outcome/objective.


Unit Outcome/Objective #7

 

What will your unit accomplish?  Be specific.

 

The chemistry department will successfully campaign for a new modern chemistry building. 

 

ASSESSMENT PLAN –

 

It is recommended that a minimum of two methods of assessment be prepared for each unit outcome/objective.

 

Method of Assessment #1:

 

A.     The condition of the chemistry building is an extremely large obstacle to overcome when it comes to recruiting/retaining biochemistry/chemistry majors and conducting research due to lack of space.

 

B.     A new chemistry facility will be 100% funded and chemistry department moved into the facility within 5 years.

 

 

ASSESSMENT COLLECTION – Project will be evaluated on a yearly basis.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________

 

ASSESSMENT REPORT - These items are completed after assessment activities, at the end of the assessment period.

 

            Findings: What findings resulted from assessment activities for this outcome/objective?

                                                                                                                   Assessment #1

Chemistry continues to campaign for a new modern chemistry building.  The condition of the chemistry building is an extremely large obstacle to overcome when it comes to recruiting biochemistry/chemistry undergraduate and graduate students and retaining quality faculty.  The university has submitted requests to the state, but there has been no indication as of yet if these requests will be met.

 

Chemistry will continue its quest to update the facilities.

 

Use of Results:       What changes, were made in response to the findings?  This section should indicate that relevant unit staff reviewed the assessment findings and implemented appropriate change in response to the findings.

 

Remember to complete the above information for each outcome/objective.